10 months ago

Sony is still the high-end in the absolute sense of the TV field today. The picture quality is hard power and the support of high-end feeling.

One paragraph is like this: Apple's N-piece set can be bought for two years, but if you want to collect Sony's home?

Many people may not have a chance in this life. . . . .

For many people talking about the ease of use of Internet TV, to be honest, no boot ads is the most significant ease of use.

From the experience of use, many of the features added by Internet smart TVs are not necessarily true. TV is TV. It’s good to be a TV operator. Instead of buying a TV, I will show you advertisements. I will be my voice assistant, and I will become my smart butler in a while, which is really not easy to use.

However, it is also a fact that Japanese products have not been optimized for the local market. It may be slow or perhaps not necessary. There is another way to play in the high-end market.

From my experience, the "easy to use" for mid-to-high-end users is not necessarily a real pain point. I still like the kind of remote control that is all in English. High-end users themselves are not flustered by the "easy to use" aspect. The higher the end products, the more complex they are, and the more they can be "played". Since the typical audience perception is not obvious, enterprises naturally have no incentive to optimize.

In terms of display technology, the accumulation of Japanese companies is still very deep, which is inseparable from historical opportunities. Especially in the field of black and white electricity, Sony is the absolute leader of the high-end market that represents Japanese companies.

Take the chestnuts of the auto industry, Japanese, German, and American. After the rise of the automobile industry, most of the industry's dividends were eaten by them. The best time has passed. The latecomers who lack the incremental market are hard to run. The head went. For Chinese car companies, the opportunity to turn over is more likely to be in the electric vehicle sector, because this is a new track with a wide enough incremental market and dividends.

The same is true for the black and white electric fields. The era of AIOT is not good, but the existing product field, Sony Dafa, you can't accept it, and the accumulation of all aspects is really thick enough.

This is the portable radio from Sony in 1970. The overall design and workmanship are not worse than today.

In the low-end and mid-end TV market, it must be acknowledged that Chinese enterprises, especially Internet companies, are rapidly emerging. Their ease of use and Internetization are doing very well. This is something that traditional manufacturers like Sony cannot match.

Local Internet companies are catching up with the next wave of AIOT opportunities, where Chinese companies have a good chance of winning, but it is not a level of competition.

In the high-end field, Sony has caught up with the product wave, the talent team is good, the research and development strength is sufficient, the technology accumulation is strong, and the first-mover advantage is sufficient. In the foreseeable future, it will still be the overlord of the high-end market.

In short, it is still the same sentence: Sony Dafa is good.


No Comment Yet.